Schlich Ltd +44(0) 1903 717001 info@schlich.co.uk
  • EN
  • 中文
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • Client Portal
Schlich Ltd
  • Our Firm
  • IP Services
    • Patents
    • EPO Oppositions & Appeals
    • UKIPO Proceedings
    • UPC Proceedings
    • Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • IP Strategy
  • Patent Specialities
    • Life Sciences & Biotech
    • Chemical & Pharmaceutical
    • Mechanical, Engineering and Physics
    • Software, Electronics and Communications
  • Insights
  • Inventors’ Zone
  • Contact
Select Page
UPC Case Law Update: Problem-Solving and Provisional Measures

UPC Case Law Update: Problem-Solving and Provisional Measures

by Sean Hughes | May 28, 2025 | UPC

Munich Local Division Endorses EPO’s Problem-Solution Approach In Edwards Lifesciences vs Meril (UPC_CFI_501/2023), the Munich Local Division (LD) has affirmed the use of the problem-solution approach (PSA) for assessing inventive step. The PSA, a method long...
Use Claims Can be Method Claims in Disguise, says the EPO

Use Claims Can be Method Claims in Disguise, says the EPO

by Sean Hutchinson | May 20, 2025 | EPO

It is generally accepted in the world of IP that all inventions fall into one of four categories: products, methods, apparatuses (i.e. products for carrying out specific processes), and uses. Thus, when drafting a new patent application, an important first step is to...
Who/What Can You Trust To Keep A Secret…?

Who/What Can You Trust To Keep A Secret…?

by Alex Bajjon | May 6, 2025 | EPO, UK, US & International

In order to obtain a patent, an invention must meet various criteria. One of the most important criteria is novelty, meaning that an invention must not be publicly disclosed before the patent application was filed. Disclosure may take many forms and includes...
Landmark CJEU judgement opens up new avenues for European patent litigation

Landmark CJEU judgement opens up new avenues for European patent litigation

by Carolyn Haywood | May 1, 2025 | US & International

Background The subject CJEU referral stems from an action brought before the Swedish national court by BSH Hausgeräte GmbH (‘BSH’) against Electrolux AB (‘Electrolux’) seeking an injunction and damages with respect to the unlawful use of their invention protected by...
When it comes to Post Filed Data, the Earlier the Better – A Brief Reminder Following G 2/21

When it comes to Post Filed Data, the Earlier the Better – A Brief Reminder Following G 2/21

by | Apr 29, 2025 | EPO

Specifically, the closest prior art in this case taught that a higher concentration of a particular component of the composition was advantageous. The Patentee attempted to argue that the claimed composition was inventive over the art on the basis that the same...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Search

Recent Posts

  • Squeezed Out! AstraZeneca overturns Wyeth’s $107.5M Infringement Award
  • UPC Court of Appeal Confirms Lock-in Danger
  • When “Monotherapy” Means Monotherapy: A Cautionary Tale on Claim Interpretation and Added Matter at the EPO
  • Has the EPO TBA Demolished the Essentiality Test?
  • A Clear Way Forward for Description Amendments: Decision Issued in G 1/25

Recent Comments

    CIPA
    IPReg
    CITMA
    • Instagram

    Services

    • Patents
    • EPO Oppositions & Appeals
    • UKIPO Proceedings
    • UPC Proceedings
    • Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • IP Strategy

    About

    • Our Firm
    • Careers
    • Our People
    • Policies

    Contact

    • Contact
    • Inventors Zone
    © 2026 Schlich, All rights reserved | Built by Molokini
    European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. Schlich Ltd is a UK limited company, registration no. 05238489, address: 9 St Catherine's Road, Littlehampton, West Sussex, BN17 5HS.