Schlich Ltd +44(0) 1903 717001 info@schlich.co.uk
  • EN
  • 中文
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • Client Portal
Schlich Ltd
  • Our Firm
  • IP Services
    • Patents
    • EPO Oppositions & Appeals
    • UKIPO Proceedings
    • UPC Proceedings
    • Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • IP Strategy
  • Patent Specialities
    • Life Sciences & Biotech
    • Chemical & Pharmaceutical
    • Mechanical, Engineering and Physics
    • Software, Electronics and Communications
  • Insights
  • Inventors’ Zone
  • Contact
Select Page
New Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the Use of Post-Published Data to Support Inventive Step Confirmed

New Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the Use of Post-Published Data to Support Inventive Step Confirmed

by Sean Hutchinson | Feb 8, 2022 | EPO

Background In our previous article, we discussed the expected referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case T 116/18, wherein the Board of Appeal decided greater clarity was required concerning the use of post-published data when considering inventive step. The...
US patent unenforceable for inequitable conduct as a result of contradictory submissions

US patent unenforceable for inequitable conduct as a result of contradictory submissions

by | Oct 1, 2021 | Briefings, US & International

Belcher’s patent related to a high-pH formulation of L-epinephrine (L-adrenaline) and was granted with a claim to a formulation of pH 2.8-3.3. The formulation of L-epinephrine was also the subject of a new drug application before the FDA. Hospira, who were...
New Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the Use of Post-Published Data to Support Inventive Step Confirmed

Expected new referral to the EBA on the use of post-published data to support inventive step

by | Sep 1, 2021 | EPO

In the present case the patentee wished to rely on documents dated after the filing date for their inventive step argument, stating that these documents in combination with data in the application as filed provided evidence of a synergistic effect between two...
Eli Lilly is handed another win in its efforts to keep generics companies selling ALIMTA competing drugs off the market

Eli Lilly is handed another win in its efforts to keep generics companies selling ALIMTA competing drugs off the market

by Carolyn Haywood | Feb 1, 2021 | US & International

Background The patent at issue in the present case was US7,772,209, claim 1 of which is shown below. Claim 1 A method for administering pemetrexed disodium to a patient in need thereof comprising administering an effective amount of folic acid and an effective amount...
Eli Lilly and Company v Fresenius Kabi Nederland B.V. – Hague Court of Appeal on the Dutch Approach to Equivalence in Patent Infringement cases

Eli Lilly and Company v Fresenius Kabi Nederland B.V. – Hague Court of Appeal on the Dutch Approach to Equivalence in Patent Infringement cases

by | Dec 1, 2020 | US & International

As a brief recap, claim 1 of Eli Lilly’s patent requires vitamin B12 + Pemetrexed disodium and claim 2 requires vitamin B12 + Pemetrexed disodium + folic binding protein. The potential infringer, Fresenius, used a composition including Pemetrexed tromethamine in...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Search

Recent Posts

  • Squeezed Out! AstraZeneca overturns Wyeth’s $107.5M Infringement Award
  • UPC Court of Appeal Confirms Lock-in Danger
  • When “Monotherapy” Means Monotherapy: A Cautionary Tale on Claim Interpretation and Added Matter at the EPO
  • Has the EPO TBA Demolished the Essentiality Test?
  • A Clear Way Forward for Description Amendments: Decision Issued in G 1/25

Recent Comments

    CIPA
    IPReg
    CITMA
    • Instagram

    Services

    • Patents
    • EPO Oppositions & Appeals
    • UKIPO Proceedings
    • UPC Proceedings
    • Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • IP Strategy

    About

    • Our Firm
    • Careers
    • Our People
    • Policies

    Contact

    • Contact
    • Inventors Zone
    © 2026 Schlich, All rights reserved | Built by Molokini
    European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. Schlich Ltd is a UK limited company, registration no. 05238489, address: 9 St Catherine's Road, Littlehampton, West Sussex, BN17 5HS.