Sequence Identity Claims After T 0137/24 The recent Board of Appeal decision in T 0137/24 provides useful guidance on how sequence identity claims are assessed under the EPC, particularly in relation to added matter and sufficiency. Biotech sequence-related claims are...
Background REGENXBIO and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania sued Sarepta for infringing multiple claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,526,617, which is directed to cultured host cells containing a recombinant nucleic acid molecule encoding an AAV capsid sequence...
This case is important because it allows the Supreme Court to define the point of balance between enforcement of patent rights for medical uses and the competition in the market place for generic pharmaceuticals. Consequently, the ruling of the Supreme Court will have...
In many countries, patents are granted for inventions and last for 20 years, subject to payment of renewal fees at regular intervals. However, some countries permit the patent term to be extended provided certain requirements are met. In the UK and the EU, a...
To briefly recap the key events leading up to this decision, the US Supreme Court found a lack of enablement when assessing the PCSK9 antibody claims in Amgen’s US patent and the Munich Central Division of the UPC initially revoked the European equivalent based on...
Recent Comments